srratlanta
02-19 11:19 AM
I have my labor cleared and 140 applied in 2007. Later in 2007 I had filed for 485 based on the pending 140 application and received EAD as well. But the 140 was denied later due to ineligibility to file on EB2 and a new one I140 was applied in EB2 refering the pending 485 application and the same old labor. This I140 has been pending since last few years and my attorney only received a letter stating it is under review, when a SR was raised. Meanwhile I have received EAD and AP extensions properly based on the pending 485.
I would like to apply 140 again from a different company using the old labor and refering the pending 485 application sine i am currently on EAD using the pending 485 application.
Questions
1. Can i do that?
2. If so, what documents would i need from my company to process this.
I would like to apply 140 again from a different company using the old labor and refering the pending 485 application sine i am currently on EAD using the pending 485 application.
Questions
1. Can i do that?
2. If so, what documents would i need from my company to process this.
wallpaper anyway,here is a nice uniform
martinvisalaw
01-26 05:30 PM
I don't want to second guess the experienced lawyers. They are probably planning on mentioning an alternative educational background as acceptable, in addition to the CIS. There is a place on the PERM form for this.
pappu
07-05 01:37 PM
Dude,
I don't have 15 mts time to search on forum. I had a question and I asked, Lasantha promptly answered. And you further wasted my time by writing your expert opinion and now I am wasting my time further replying to you. No hard feelings adios!
Pls do not be rude in your responses. How can you expect others to spend time answering your questions if you dont have time for them.
By creating new threads on the same topic you are wasting everyone's time and making it difficult for us to manage the forum. Please understand and spend a few minutes on the forum before you post a question.
I don't have 15 mts time to search on forum. I had a question and I asked, Lasantha promptly answered. And you further wasted my time by writing your expert opinion and now I am wasting my time further replying to you. No hard feelings adios!
Pls do not be rude in your responses. How can you expect others to spend time answering your questions if you dont have time for them.
By creating new threads on the same topic you are wasting everyone's time and making it difficult for us to manage the forum. Please understand and spend a few minutes on the forum before you post a question.
2011 (North) Korean army.
AllIzzWell
05-03 04:13 PM
austingc,
Thank you for the advise.
My wife has already gone to the consulate and got her stamping. So she is out of the loop, its only me who needs the stamp.
To put my question in a different way:
Will the consulate cancel/stops/statusquo my wifes H4 visa as the H1B is in "Admin Processing"?
Thanks again.
Thank you for the advise.
My wife has already gone to the consulate and got her stamping. So she is out of the loop, its only me who needs the stamp.
To put my question in a different way:
Will the consulate cancel/stops/statusquo my wifes H4 visa as the H1B is in "Admin Processing"?
Thanks again.
more...
lc1978
08-17 08:23 PM
Hello Gurus,
Pl guide me and let me know my options for the below scenario...
1. Me: Applied under EB2 (India) and have I-140 approved in September 2006.
Status as of now : Applied as dependent (secondary) on my spouse 485 and have EAD and AP since July 2007.
2. My spouse : Primary applicant - EB3 (India), December 2003.
As the dates are NOT moving forward for EB3 (India), I want to port our GC application dates from my spouse priority ( EB3- India - December 2003) to mine (EB2 - India - September 2006)
My question is, Can I change my status from dependent (secondary ) on my spouse 485 to me being primary applicant by invoking my approved I-140 (EB2 - India - September 2006), If YES what would be the process.
Thanks in advance
Pl guide me and let me know my options for the below scenario...
1. Me: Applied under EB2 (India) and have I-140 approved in September 2006.
Status as of now : Applied as dependent (secondary) on my spouse 485 and have EAD and AP since July 2007.
2. My spouse : Primary applicant - EB3 (India), December 2003.
As the dates are NOT moving forward for EB3 (India), I want to port our GC application dates from my spouse priority ( EB3- India - December 2003) to mine (EB2 - India - September 2006)
My question is, Can I change my status from dependent (secondary ) on my spouse 485 to me being primary applicant by invoking my approved I-140 (EB2 - India - September 2006), If YES what would be the process.
Thanks in advance
leoindiano
08-22 11:57 AM
receipt number, i had it for EAD renewal couple of days back. ...I remember both the times, they have used receipt numbers only....
more...
lvinaykumar
06-24 04:47 PM
If you find a document let us know. that would be really interesting...
2010 North Korean soldiers parade
Prashanthi
09-04 01:45 PM
If the H-1 was filed as a COS you will have to join the H-1 company on October 1, as you will no longer be on L-1 on that date. If you H-1 is filed for consular processing, then you dont have to worry, whenever you are ready you can go to the consulate in your home country, get a visa and come back on H-1b status.
more...
neeidd
07-14 01:06 PM
Hi Gurus,
I need some advice from you guys
My initial receipt date for I-485 from Vermont service center was July 7th 2007. But when I-485 was transferred to Texas service center, receipt date on I-485 is showing as September 11th 2007. Can we do anything to correct the wrong receipt dates as this might have significant impact on my processing times. Please advice
Thanks
I need some advice from you guys
My initial receipt date for I-485 from Vermont service center was July 7th 2007. But when I-485 was transferred to Texas service center, receipt date on I-485 is showing as September 11th 2007. Can we do anything to correct the wrong receipt dates as this might have significant impact on my processing times. Please advice
Thanks
hair to watch North Korea take
looneytunezez
11-02 12:19 PM
Thanks...but i agree with your paralegal friend.......there is no logic to it all.
logic and law are not usually on "friendly" terms....
i guess the argument is that one who hasn't filed, cannot be counted.... and you cannot file until you are current.... so no backlog exists .... so non-filers (due to PD) do not exist and hence there is no "official" classification for them i guess.
I know what looneytunezez says is logical, however, a friend of mine who is a paralegal in a big immigration law firm says otherwise (something similar to what blacktongue says) - don't know what to make of it, hence the post..
logic and law are not usually on "friendly" terms....
i guess the argument is that one who hasn't filed, cannot be counted.... and you cannot file until you are current.... so no backlog exists .... so non-filers (due to PD) do not exist and hence there is no "official" classification for them i guess.
I know what looneytunezez says is logical, however, a friend of mine who is a paralegal in a big immigration law firm says otherwise (something similar to what blacktongue says) - don't know what to make of it, hence the post..
more...
njhokie2002
06-24 06:43 PM
nice job fellas, however grinch i think you mean "than" on your title for the galaxy one, since its being used as a measure of comparison :) other than that, great job.
i got brich in this one!
i got brich in this one!
hot (North) Korean army.
tarone
11-28 05:22 PM
Hi,
There is wrong priority date on my Labor Certification approval. They
put 2001 instead of 2002 .
It looks they apparently mixed date with some other candidate who have
similar name as mine. They lost his case and put his priority date on mine.
Now can somebody tell me what are my options?
I can not file if the priority date is correct on LCA. But If I apply
for 1-485 using this wrong date, it may be risky because if they find
the correct date it may be problem.
Therefore, I don;t want to take any risk, I just want to apply for
I-140 but should I contact LABOR OFFICE to fix the date and then submit
the application for I-140. Unfortunately Labor Office is not replied
yet on my request to fix this issue.
Any Advice.
There is wrong priority date on my Labor Certification approval. They
put 2001 instead of 2002 .
It looks they apparently mixed date with some other candidate who have
similar name as mine. They lost his case and put his priority date on mine.
Now can somebody tell me what are my options?
I can not file if the priority date is correct on LCA. But If I apply
for 1-485 using this wrong date, it may be risky because if they find
the correct date it may be problem.
Therefore, I don;t want to take any risk, I just want to apply for
I-140 but should I contact LABOR OFFICE to fix the date and then submit
the application for I-140. Unfortunately Labor Office is not replied
yet on my request to fix this issue.
Any Advice.
more...
house North Korean Military
martinvisalaw
09-10 12:52 PM
The withdrawal of the H-1B is not really what decides whether you are out of status. Presumably the former employer withdrew because you no longer work there. In that case, you have been out of status since you came off payroll.
However, if there is only a short gap between your last paystub and when the new company files the H-1B, you could still be approved for a change of employer and extension. You should discuss with the lawyer preparing the new H-1B.
You should not be subject to the cap in any case, since you were already counted towards the cap within the past 6 years.
However, if there is only a short gap between your last paystub and when the new company files the H-1B, you could still be approved for a change of employer and extension. You should discuss with the lawyer preparing the new H-1B.
You should not be subject to the cap in any case, since you were already counted towards the cap within the past 6 years.
tattoo Uniform/Security Uniform/ Army
java_jaggu
01-22 02:54 PM
Kevin,
It's no different using the future employment EAD from that of a current employment EAD. However, I would suggest you work for that future employment company for say 6 months before you use AC21 and move on to a different job. This would alleviate the risk of INS considering your case to be fradulent.
It's no different using the future employment EAD from that of a current employment EAD. However, I would suggest you work for that future employment company for say 6 months before you use AC21 and move on to a different job. This would alleviate the risk of INS considering your case to be fradulent.
more...
pictures girlfriend 2010 North Korea
syedajmal
01-28 11:46 PM
I am in a similar situation and need to travel. Applied for my AP on Apr/20/2010. I have put in an expedited request a week ago but still no response. Just booked an Infopass appointment for Feb/04/2011. Wanted to make it is fine and any suggestions on what I should carry with me.
Thanks in advance,
-Syed
Thanks in advance,
-Syed
dresses (North) Korean army.
Blog Feeds
03-08 07:40 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi51RRPnbOfgMCurqTtKh5IoSx7Kso51jnsNxDYkPNLvdPB1gPGcMOlbbNuswAAxICJLu3ZrjV2P_MWsQG7-KAXLdgB1CUaOtvV3nDJlqbEsx-8jGv0Msij_AHoMuTXkbUYkhuxvkklUd0/s320/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi51RRPnbOfgMCurqTtKh5IoSx7Kso51jnsNxDYkPNLvdPB1gPGcMOlbbNuswAAxICJLu3ZrjV2P_MWsQG7-KAXLdgB1CUaOtvV3nDJlqbEsx-8jGv0Msij_AHoMuTXkbUYkhuxvkklUd0/s1600-h/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg)
By Deborah Notkin, AILA Past President
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has successfully carried out a crusade against the fraud and deception of "immigration consultants" who take advantage of unknowing and vulnerable immigrants. At a recent media conference, Cuomo indicated that his office is seeking civil remedies, at least initially against those involved in immigration assistance fraud because the first goal is to get restitution for victims. http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2010/mar/mar1a_10.html
The latest victory in the fight against immigration fraud and victimization was announced by Cuomo's office on March 1, 2010. The Attorney Generals' Office has won a court judgment of more than $3 million against a "consultant" in Queens who has targeted and defrauded immigrants. In this case, the "consultant" routinely charged a retainer of $7,000 with fees often reaching up to $15,000 per person for the promise of permanent residence. The consultant wrongly claimed that she could get permanent resident status through alleged relationships with government officials. Of course, the services were never performed and the consultant routinely refused to give refunds or return documents.
As a result of Cuomo's lawsuit, the New York Supreme Court has ordered the consultant to pay full restitution to 37 families who came forward and demonstrated that they were defrauded by this consultant. An additional $2.7 million in penalties was imposed for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and misrepresentation of services that could be performed. The consultant is also permanently restricted directly and indirectly from engaging in the business of immigration-related services.
Over the past several months, other consultants have been shut down and active investigations continue. The fight to end this blight on immigrant communities in New York City and State continues and serves as an example for all who are committed to fighting immigration fraud and the unauthorized practice of law.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5282899656706770162?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-york-attorney-general-cuomo-gets.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi51RRPnbOfgMCurqTtKh5IoSx7Kso51jnsNxDYkPNLvdPB1gPGcMOlbbNuswAAxICJLu3ZrjV2P_MWsQG7-KAXLdgB1CUaOtvV3nDJlqbEsx-8jGv0Msij_AHoMuTXkbUYkhuxvkklUd0/s320/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi51RRPnbOfgMCurqTtKh5IoSx7Kso51jnsNxDYkPNLvdPB1gPGcMOlbbNuswAAxICJLu3ZrjV2P_MWsQG7-KAXLdgB1CUaOtvV3nDJlqbEsx-8jGv0Msij_AHoMuTXkbUYkhuxvkklUd0/s1600-h/2010-03-07+alg_cuomo1.jpg)
By Deborah Notkin, AILA Past President
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has successfully carried out a crusade against the fraud and deception of "immigration consultants" who take advantage of unknowing and vulnerable immigrants. At a recent media conference, Cuomo indicated that his office is seeking civil remedies, at least initially against those involved in immigration assistance fraud because the first goal is to get restitution for victims. http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2010/mar/mar1a_10.html
The latest victory in the fight against immigration fraud and victimization was announced by Cuomo's office on March 1, 2010. The Attorney Generals' Office has won a court judgment of more than $3 million against a "consultant" in Queens who has targeted and defrauded immigrants. In this case, the "consultant" routinely charged a retainer of $7,000 with fees often reaching up to $15,000 per person for the promise of permanent residence. The consultant wrongly claimed that she could get permanent resident status through alleged relationships with government officials. Of course, the services were never performed and the consultant routinely refused to give refunds or return documents.
As a result of Cuomo's lawsuit, the New York Supreme Court has ordered the consultant to pay full restitution to 37 families who came forward and demonstrated that they were defrauded by this consultant. An additional $2.7 million in penalties was imposed for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and misrepresentation of services that could be performed. The consultant is also permanently restricted directly and indirectly from engaging in the business of immigration-related services.
Over the past several months, other consultants have been shut down and active investigations continue. The fight to end this blight on immigrant communities in New York City and State continues and serves as an example for all who are committed to fighting immigration fraud and the unauthorized practice of law.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5282899656706770162?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-york-attorney-general-cuomo-gets.html)
more...
makeup (North) Korean army.
Kitiara
10-22 04:39 AM
I always use www.1001freefonts.com (http://www.1001freefonts.com) - it does exactly what it says on the tin.
Er... Non UK people might not get that reference...
Er... Non UK people might not get that reference...
girlfriend Note North Korean Army guards,
Suva
07-18 04:05 PM
This discussion is already going on in another thread.
Here is the link http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10428&page=2
Please search in the forums before opening a new thread.
Here is the link http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10428&page=2
Please search in the forums before opening a new thread.
hairstyles wears a military uniform
gc_chahiye
07-26 11:20 AM
:)) nice !!
Write LSAT and go to Law School and become a lawyer and to start practicing you should get admitted to the bar. The bar requirements vary.
In some states like california , you can work under a attorney for 10 (if not ten say 'n') years and get addmitted to the bar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_Education
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSAT
good luck!!
thanks!!
Write LSAT and go to Law School and become a lawyer and to start practicing you should get admitted to the bar. The bar requirements vary.
In some states like california , you can work under a attorney for 10 (if not ten say 'n') years and get addmitted to the bar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_Education
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSAT
good luck!!
thanks!!
pthoko
07-13 12:04 AM
Would going to Canada and re-entering without going for visa stamping count as lawful entry??
Or one has to go and get the visa stamped to qualify as lawful entry??
Also when you go to Canada and come back Without VISA stamping, he gets the same I-94 or different I-94??
Thanks.
Or one has to go and get the visa stamped to qualify as lawful entry??
Also when you go to Canada and come back Without VISA stamping, he gets the same I-94 or different I-94??
Thanks.
wisley
11-10 08:59 PM
to be frank with you guys my friend have a good bank statment and business in his own country he wanna apply for a tourist visa and i recomended for him to have a hotels .... flight reservation but i am still confused about the purpose of the visit actually its not about the purpose its about his chance to get a visa he never been in the US never apply for a visa , dont have any relatives in the US he wanna try his chances to get a visa only ?????
thats all , any insight :confused:
thats all , any insight :confused:
No comments:
Post a Comment